<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ComTech Review &#187; advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comtechreview.com/tag/advertising/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comtechreview.com</link>
	<description>Computers, Communications and Technology Review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Reinventing Print Media: IDG&#8217;s Online Ad Network Gains Traction</title>
		<link>http://comtechreview.com/2009/09/08/reinventing-print-media-idgs-online-ad-network-gains-traction.html</link>
		<comments>http://comtechreview.com/2009/09/08/reinventing-print-media-idgs-online-ad-network-gains-traction.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet & Businesss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2009/09/reinventing_pri.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows the print media is in a world of hurt. The more difficult question is this: What do publishers do about it?</p>

<p>Technology publishing giant IDG just may have come up with one killer idea. And no, the answer does not involve scantily clad women or slide shows touting the best nude beaches.</p>

<p>For IDG, the publishers of hundreds of magazines such as PC World and Macworld, the answer was to go against one of the industry’s most sacred notions and <a href="http://idgtechnetwork.com/about_us/pr_030508.php">create its own online advertising network--with a major twist</a>. Instead of only selling ads for its own properties, IDG would take advantage of the media’s fragmentation and the shift to online advertising <em>by selling ads for other new media properties</em>. In addition, the network also helps IDG Web sites to grow their audience by syndicating their content across the Web to non-IDG properties. (BusinessWeek, for example, syndicates IDG content on its Web site.)</p>

<p>It's a bold strategy that seems to be paying off. <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/pete-longo/1/ba7/671">Peter Longo, CEO of IDG Syndication and Networks</a>, says that its network is currently serving ads to a combined total 75 million unique monthly readers, up from 20 million 18 months ago when it launched the group. Currently, IDG works with about 200 Web sites, including GigaOm, Slashgear, and Xconomy.com, with plans to expand to 300 sites. All told, those sites serve up nearly 750 million ad impressions per month. Revenue is forecast to grow 100% this year, says Longo. 20 syndication partners have signed on to the program as well.</p>

<p>“For us it’s been a successful strategy,” says Longo, a veteran tech publishing exec who used to work at Ziff Davis and CMP Media. “It’s a way to make a leap from our deep technology past to our Web-based future. You don’t have to own all of your content.”</p>

<p>Sure, the online ad network market is as crowded as Grand Central Station during rush hour. But the networks continue to grow as advertisers seek to reach specific groups or audiences across the Web. IDG competes against many networks, including bigger companies such as AOL and Yahoo!, and smaller networks such as NetShelter Technology Media and Federated Media. Among nearly 500 people polled in <a href="http://www.collective.com/pn018">Collective Media's May 2009 survey</a>, 89% said they intend to work with ad networks this year, a 5% rise from 2008. However, the same survey said 71% of respondents noted that there are now too many ad networks, up from 62% in 2008.</p>

<p>Longo says IDG Syndication and Networks is trying to gain an edge by offering higher-than-average ad rates, a focus on premium technology content and a global reach. The average rate it charges is $8 to $14 per thousand impressions, with some premium channels going for $25 or more. Revenue is split 50-50 with the publishers. Currently, the company has sales people in 9 countries, including India, Japan and Korea, with plans to expand to 14 countries. It’s expensive but it allows the company to charge higher ad rates to local businesses. “We don’t want to become the biggest network per se,” says Longo. “We want to be the largest network for technology.”</p>

<p>It won’t be easy to grow its ad network with new competitors popping up every day, and brands cutting the number of ad network partners they work with. But IDG seems to making headway by rethinking some of the industry’s most sacrosanct notions and coming up with a unique formula in an increasingly crowded space. Desperate times call for desperate measures.</p>

<p>- Spencer Ante also publishes the Creative Capital blog. <a href="http://creativecapital.wordpress.com">Click here to see more.</a><br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bw_rss/techbeat/~4/6fhFE6XlAtw" height="1"/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows the print media is in a world of hurt. The more difficult question is this: What do publishers do about it?</p>

<p>Technology publishing giant IDG just may have come up with one killer idea. And no, the answer does not involve scantily clad women or slide shows touting the best nude beaches.</p>

<p>For IDG, the publishers of hundreds of magazines such as PC World and Macworld, the answer was to go against one of the industry’s most sacred notions and <a href="http://idgtechnetwork.com/about_us/pr_030508.php">create its own online advertising network--with a major twist</a>. Instead of only selling ads for its own properties, IDG would take advantage of the media’s fragmentation and the shift to online advertising <em>by selling ads for other new media properties</em>. In addition, the network also helps IDG Web sites to grow their audience by syndicating their content across the Web to non-IDG properties. (BusinessWeek, for example, syndicates IDG content on its Web site.)</p>

<p>It's a bold strategy that seems to be paying off. <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/pete-longo/1/ba7/671">Peter Longo, CEO of IDG Syndication and Networks</a>, says that its network is currently serving ads to a combined total 75 million unique monthly readers, up from 20 million 18 months ago when it launched the group. Currently, IDG works with about 200 Web sites, including GigaOm, Slashgear, and Xconomy.com, with plans to expand to 300 sites. All told, those sites serve up nearly 750 million ad impressions per month. Revenue is forecast to grow 100% this year, says Longo. 20 syndication partners have signed on to the program as well.</p>

<p>“For us it’s been a successful strategy,” says Longo, a veteran tech publishing exec who used to work at Ziff Davis and CMP Media. “It’s a way to make a leap from our deep technology past to our Web-based future. You don’t have to own all of your content.”</p>

<p>Sure, the online ad network market is as crowded as Grand Central Station during rush hour. But the networks continue to grow as advertisers seek to reach specific groups or audiences across the Web. IDG competes against many networks, including bigger companies such as AOL and Yahoo!, and smaller networks such as NetShelter Technology Media and Federated Media. Among nearly 500 people polled in <a href="http://www.collective.com/pn018">Collective Media's May 2009 survey</a>, 89% said they intend to work with ad networks this year, a 5% rise from 2008. However, the same survey said 71% of respondents noted that there are now too many ad networks, up from 62% in 2008.</p>

<p>Longo says IDG Syndication and Networks is trying to gain an edge by offering higher-than-average ad rates, a focus on premium technology content and a global reach. The average rate it charges is $8 to $14 per thousand impressions, with some premium channels going for $25 or more. Revenue is split 50-50 with the publishers. Currently, the company has sales people in 9 countries, including India, Japan and Korea, with plans to expand to 14 countries. It’s expensive but it allows the company to charge higher ad rates to local businesses. “We don’t want to become the biggest network per se,” says Longo. “We want to be the largest network for technology.”</p>

<p>It won’t be easy to grow its ad network with new competitors popping up every day, and brands cutting the number of ad network partners they work with. But IDG seems to making headway by rethinking some of the industry’s most sacrosanct notions and coming up with a unique formula in an increasingly crowded space. Desperate times call for desperate measures.</p>

<p>- Spencer Ante also publishes the Creative Capital blog. <a href="http://creativecapital.wordpress.com">Click here to see more.</a><br />
</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bw_rss/techbeat/~4/6fhFE6XlAtw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://comtechreview.com/2009/09/08/reinventing-print-media-idgs-online-ad-network-gains-traction.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Sign of Hope for Online Ad Prices</title>
		<link>http://comtechreview.com/2009/07/23/a-sign-of-hope-for-online-ad-prices.html</link>
		<comments>http://comtechreview.com/2009/07/23/a-sign-of-hope-for-online-ad-prices.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet & Businesss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2009/07/a_sign_of_hope.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="PubMatic.JPG" src="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/PubMatic.JPG" width="579" height="332" /></p>

<p>Prices for display ads have been dropping for some time. The suspects are easy to identify: the poor economy, which is not only reducing ad budgets but also driving marketers to more direct-response search ads, and the ever-growing glut of inventory on the infinite Web. Dropping ad prices are one reason <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jul2009/tc20090721_954463.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_top+stories">Yahoo reported disappointing earnings</a> on July 21 and CEO Carol Bartz saw no firm sign of a turnaround.</p>

<p>But there's at least one sign that things may be improving. PubMatic, which helps online publishers run more lucrative ads, says in a <a href="www.pubmatic.com/adpricebrief">new report</a> out Thursday morning that it's seeing a steady increase in the price of display ad space sold through ad networks and exchanges. They've risen 47% since the end of January (35% since the end of 2008, January being a weak month for ad spending). Pricing has risen every month since the start of the year.</p>

<p>What's going on? PubMatic CEO Rajeev Goel told me in an email:<br />
<blockquote><br />
There are two fundamental trends driving this rise in pricing:</blockquote></p>

<p>1) Supply and Demand. On the supply side, we have seen a drop in the number of web services that rely on advertising revenue as their business models, as this model has fallen out of favor. Even some traditional businesses such as newspapers have been shrinking with respect to online presence. On the demand side, recent reports from Outsell and Forrester highlighted that even though total ad spending (traditional and online) has dropped due to the recession, online advertising is growing in terms of both market share and total spend. This includes display as well as search.</p>

<p>2) Innovation in the 2nd channel. In the last 1-2 years, we have seen a tremendous amount of innovation in the ecosystem around the 2nd channel (unsold ad inventory, or what some call non-guaranteed, generally sold on a cost-per-click or cost-per-acquisition basis, unlike premium ad space generally sold by the impression for branding purposes). Media exchanges, data exchanges, deep targeting ad networks, ad network optimizers, etc. have been growing in number and scale. As a result, inefficiency in the market is being eliminated and there is more and more data used for ad targeting. This is increasing pricing in the space.</p>

<p><br />
It's best not to read too much into this, since it's based largely on U.S. sites, and only inventory sold through ad networks, not the premium-priced display ads sold directly by publishers' sales force. Also, I've found that studies from various firms tend to vary widely. But any sign of improvement has to cheer beleaguered online publishers.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bw_rss/techbeat/~4/au0OVOuno3A" height="1"/>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="PubMatic.JPG" src="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/PubMatic.JPG" width="579" height="332" /></p>

<p>Prices for display ads have been dropping for some time. The suspects are easy to identify: the poor economy, which is not only reducing ad budgets but also driving marketers to more direct-response search ads, and the ever-growing glut of inventory on the infinite Web. Dropping ad prices are one reason <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jul2009/tc20090721_954463.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_top+stories">Yahoo reported disappointing earnings</a> on July 21 and CEO Carol Bartz saw no firm sign of a turnaround.</p>

<p>But there's at least one sign that things may be improving. PubMatic, which helps online publishers run more lucrative ads, says in a <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2009/07/www.pubmatic.com/adpricebrief">new report</a> out Thursday morning that it's seeing a steady increase in the price of display ad space sold through ad networks and exchanges. They've risen 47% since the end of January (35% since the end of 2008, January being a weak month for ad spending). Pricing has risen every month since the start of the year.</p>

<p>What's going on? PubMatic CEO Rajeev Goel told me in an email:<br />
<blockquote><br />
There are two fundamental trends driving this rise in pricing:</blockquote></p>

<p>1) Supply and Demand. On the supply side, we have seen a drop in the number of web services that rely on advertising revenue as their business models, as this model has fallen out of favor. Even some traditional businesses such as newspapers have been shrinking with respect to online presence. On the demand side, recent reports from Outsell and Forrester highlighted that even though total ad spending (traditional and online) has dropped due to the recession, online advertising is growing in terms of both market share and total spend. This includes display as well as search.</p>

<p>2) Innovation in the 2nd channel. In the last 1-2 years, we have seen a tremendous amount of innovation in the ecosystem around the 2nd channel (unsold ad inventory, or what some call non-guaranteed, generally sold on a cost-per-click or cost-per-acquisition basis, unlike premium ad space generally sold by the impression for branding purposes). Media exchanges, data exchanges, deep targeting ad networks, ad network optimizers, etc. have been growing in number and scale. As a result, inefficiency in the market is being eliminated and there is more and more data used for ad targeting. This is increasing pricing in the space.</p>

<p><br />
It's best not to read too much into this, since it's based largely on U.S. sites, and only inventory sold through ad networks, not the premium-priced display ads sold directly by publishers' sales force. Also, I've found that studies from various firms tend to vary widely. But any sign of improvement has to cheer beleaguered online publishers.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/bw_rss/techbeat/~4/au0OVOuno3A" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://comtechreview.com/2009/07/23/a-sign-of-hope-for-online-ad-prices.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
